Join the conversation. Browse active threads and share your insights.
15
Total Threads
0
Active Today
17
Total Replies
0
Trending Now
After months of optimization, I've finally cracked a stable M1 scalping strategy for XAUUSD. Key settings: - Lot size: 0.01 per $1000 - TP: 8 pips, SL: 12 pips - Trading hours: 8:00-16:00 GMT only (avoid Asian session) - Spread filter: max 25 points - Uses custom RSI divergence + volume confirmation Backtest results from Jan-Oct 2024: 68% win rate, profit factor 1.85, max DD 14.2%. Running live on IC Markets for 3 weeks, currently up $1,247 on $10k account. Anyone else trading Gold on M1? What's your approach to handling the volatility spikes during news events?
MetaQuotes just released MT5 build 3900 with some significant changes: **Key Updates:** š§ **Performance Improvements** - 30% faster backtesting on multi-core processors - Optimized memory usage for EAs with many indicators - Faster chart rendering š **New Features** - Enhanced Strategy Tester with genetic optimization - New built-in indicators (21 total additions) - Improved MQL5 debugger - Cloud terminal synchronization ā ļø **Breaking Changes** - OrderSend() now requires type_filling parameter (see my troubleshooting thread) - Some deprecated functions removed - Changed behavior for pending order modification š **Bug Fixes** - Fixed memory leak in custom indicators - Corrected timezone issues in Strategy Tester - Fixed crash when loading large history files **Recommendation:** Test your EAs in demo before updating live accounts. Some older EAs may need code updates. Download: Official MetaQuotes website Anyone updated yet? Any issues?
ā Failed to initialize Firebase Admin SDK: SyntaxError: Expected ',' or '}' after property value in JSON at position 2341 (line 1 column 2342) at JSON.parse (<anonymous>) at initializeFirebase (C:\Users\ADMIN\Downloads\yoforexlatest\server\auth.ts:24:33) at <anonymous> (C:\Users\ADMIN\Downloads\yoforexlatest\server\auth.ts:311:1) at ModuleJob.run (node:internal/modules/esm/module_job:371:25) at async onImport.tracePromise.__proto__ (node:internal/modules/esm/loader:683:26) at async registerRoutes (C:\Users\ADMIN\Downloads\yoforexlatest\server\routes.ts:518:7) at async initializeApp (C:\Users\ADMIN\Downloads\yoforexlatest\server\index.ts:167:24) at async <anonymous> (C:\Users\ADMIN\Downloads\yoforexlatest\server\index.ts:281:27)
A critical vulnerability named 'React2Shell' (CVE-2025-55182) affects React Server Components, permitting unauthenticated remote code execution (RCE) through a single crafted HTTP request. Developers are advised to update their applications to patched versions of React and Next.js and redeploy to address this maximum CVSS 10.0 severity risk.A critical vulnerability named 'React2Shell' (CVE-2025-55182) affects React Server Components, permitting unauthenticated remote code execution (RCE) through a single crafted HTTP request. Developers are advised to update their applications to patched versions of React and Next.js and redeploy to address this maximum CVSS 10.0 severity risk.A critical vulnerability named 'React2Shell' (CVE-2025-55182) affects React Server Components, permitting unauthenticated remote code execution (RCE) through a single crafted HTTP request. Developers are advised to update their applications to patched versions of React and Next.js and redeploy to address this maximum CVSS 10.0 severity risk.
A critical vulnerability named 'React2Shell' (CVE-2025-55182) affects React Server Components, permitting unauthenticated remote code execution (RCE) through a single crafted HTTP request. Developers are advised to update their applications to patched versions of React and Next.js and redeploy to address this maximum CVSS 10.0 severity risk. A critical vulnerability named 'React2Shell' (CVE-2025-55182) affects React Server Components, permitting unauthenticated remote code execution (RCE) through a single crafted HTTP request. Developers are advised to update their applications to patched versions of React and Next.js and redeploy to address this maximum CVSS 10.0 severity risk. A critical vulnerability named 'React2Shell' (CVE-2025-55182) affects React Server Components, permitting unauthenticated remote code execution (RCE) through a single crafted HTTP request. Developers are advised to update their applications to patched versions of React and Next.js and redeploy to address this maximum CVSS 10.0 severity risk. A critical vulnerability named 'React2Shell' (CVE-2025-55182) affects React Server Components, permitting unauthenticated remote code execution (RCE) through a single crafted HTTP request. Developers are advised to update their applications to patched versions of React and Next.js and redeploy to address this maximum CVSS 10.0 severity risk.
**Overall Rating: 3.5/5** I've been running Forex Fury on a live account for 6 months. Here's my honest assessment: **Pros:** ā Consistent small profits (average $200/week on $5k account) ā Good documentation and support ā Regular updates from developer ā Works on multiple brokers ā Low drawdown (max 12% in my testing) **Cons:** ā Expensive ($349 one-time) ā Needs VPS (adds monthly cost) ā Very sensitive to spread - useless on high-spread brokers ā Stopped working well after September update ā Refund policy is complicated **Results:** - Starting: $5,000 - After 6 months: $6,847 - Total profit: +36.9% - Max DD: 11.8% **Recommendation:** Good for set-and-forget style, but there are cheaper alternatives with similar performance. Worth it if you catch a sale. Happy to answer questions!
I ran a 30-day test comparing execution quality on both brokers using the same EA: **Test Setup:** - Same EA, same settings - $5k account on each - EURUSD, GBPUSD only - News trading EA (high slippage risk) **IC Markets:** - Average slippage: 0.4 pips - Positive slippage: 23% - Requotes: 2 (out of 847 orders) - Execution speed: 18ms average **Pepperstone:** - Average slippage: 0.6 pips - Positive slippage: 19% - Requotes: 5 (out of 839 orders) - Execution speed: 22ms average **Verdict:** IC Markets slightly better, but both are excellent. Pepperstone has better customer service though. For news trading specifically, IC Markets edge is worth it. Note: I'm on Sydney VPS for both, your results may vary based on location.
Just finished a comprehensive backtest of my grid EA on EURUSD H1 using real tick data: š **Results Summary:** - Initial deposit: $10,000 - Final balance: $47,832 - Total net profit: $37,832 (378.32%) - Win rate: 71.4% - Profit factor: 2.14 - Max drawdown: 18.7% ($1,870) - Total trades: 2,847 - Sharpe ratio: 1.93 **Settings:** - Grid step: 20 pips - Max grid levels: 8 - Lot multiplier: 1.5 - TP per level: 15 pips Backtest quality was 99% (real ticks, every tick mode). Broker model: IC Markets. The strategy worked especially well during 2022-2023 trending markets. Attached: Full backtest report + statement HTML. Questions welcome!
I've built a robust EA template that includes: ```mql5 // Multi-pair trading support // Dynamic lot sizing based on account equity // Advanced trailing stop with breakeven logic // Session filters (London, NY, Asian) // Spread monitoring and trade validation // Email + push notifications ``` The template uses class-based architecture for easy maintenance. Includes proper error handling for order placement and modification. Works with both hedging and netting accounts. Looking for beta testers! Drop a comment if you want to try it. Also open to suggestions for additional features.
**Weekly Update - Live Account Performance** Starting balance: $5,000 Current balance: $8,247 Profit this week: +$847 (+11.4%) Trades this week: 47 Win rate: 68% Largest win: $284 Largest loss: -$156 Broker: Pepperstone RAW Average spread: 0.6 pips (EURUSD) The EA uses a controlled martingale system with max 3 recovery attempts. This week was smooth - only had to recover twice and both times it worked perfectly. Still maintaining strict 15% max DD rule. ā ļø **Risk Warning:** Martingale is high risk. Only using 2% per initial trade. Not recommended for beginners. Myfxbook link in profile for live verification.
Technical + fundamental analysis pointing to strong bullish momentum: **Technical:** - Broke above 2,150 resistance with high volume - RSI showing strength but not overbought - MACD golden cross on daily - Fibonacci 1.618 extension targets 2,205 **Fundamental:** - Fed likely to pause rate hikes - Geopolitical tensions increasing (safe haven demand) - Dollar weakening against major currencies - Central banks accumulating gold **My positions:** - Long from 2,145, SL at 2,120 - TP1: 2,180 (50% close) - TP2: 2,205 (remaining 50%) Risk/reward: 1:2.4 What's your take? Am I being too optimistic?
Built a powerful indicator that automatically identifies: ā Order blocks (bullish/bearish) ā Fair value gaps (FVG) ā Break of structure (BOS) ā Change of character (CHoCH) ā Liquidity zones Works on all timeframes. Highlights high-probability zones where institutions are likely entering. The indicator plots boxes on the chart and sends alerts when price approaches these levels. **Installation:** 1. Copy to Indicators folder 2. Restart MT5 3. Drag onto chart **Settings:** - FVG minimum size: 10 pips (adjustable) - Order block lookback: 100 bars - Alert enabled: true/false Free download in comments. Would love feedback from SMC traders!
**PROBLEM SOLVED - Posting solution for others** Issue: EA compiled fine, no errors in log, but stopped opening any trades after MT5 build 3850 update. **What I tried (didn't work):** - Recompiling EA - Checking AutoTrading button - Verifying account permissions - Reinstalling MT5 **SOLUTION:** The new MT5 build changed how trade requests are validated. Had to update the EA code: ```mql5 // OLD CODE (broken): request.type = ORDER_TYPE_BUY; request.action = TRADE_ACTION_DEAL; // NEW CODE (working): request.action = TRADE_ACTION_DEAL; request.type = ORDER_TYPE_BUY; request.type_filling = ORDER_FILLING_FOK; // THIS WAS MISSING! ``` Adding `type_filling` fixed it! All trades working normally now. Hope this helps someone else stuck with the same issue.
Revenge trading nearly destroyed my account. Here's how I fixed it: **The Problem:** After every loss, I'd immediately open a larger position to "win it back." Lost $3,200 in one afternoon doing this. **What Changed:** 1. **Mandatory Break Rule** - After any loss: 2-hour minimum break - After 3 losses in a row: Stop for the day - No exceptions 2. **Pre-Trade Checklist** - Am I calm and focused? (Yes/No) - Is this based on my strategy? (Yes/No) - Have I waited the required time? (Yes/No) - All must be YES or no trade 3. **Daily Loss Limit** - Max 3% account loss per day - EA automatically stops at -3% - Cannot override it 4. **Trading Journal** - Record emotional state before each trade - Review weekly to identify patterns - Realized most losses happened when angry/frustrated **Results:** Went from losing 2 months to profitable 4 months in a row. Win rate improved from 43% to 61% just by controlling emotions. Anyone else struggle with this? What techniques worked for you?
Last month I violated my own risk management rules and paid the price. Sharing this as a cautionary tale. **What Happened:** - Usually risk 2% per trade max - Got overconfident after 8 wins in a row - Increased to 5% per trade - Hit a 6-trade losing streak - Lost 28% of account in 2 days **The Recovery:** - Immediately stopped trading for 1 week - Reviewed every losing trade - Went back to strict 2% rule - Took 6 weeks to recover the losses - Now back to break-even **Lessons:** 1. Never increase risk after winning streak 2. Discipline > Intelligence 3. 2% rule exists for a reason 4. One bad day can wipe out weeks of profits Anyone else have similar experiences? How did you recover mentally?